Brake upgrades - is bigger better?

Moderators: theelanman, dapinky, Specky, clemo, Nige, Sy V, Dave Eds, DaveT, Elanlover, muley, Enright, algirdas, nitroman, GeoffSmith

Postby ESM » Thu 06.07.2006, 21:10

I know I said Stoptech know what they're on about but I'll revise that opinion slightly - they usually know what they're talking about! They are wrong to suggest shifting weight distribution changes bias. It doesn't - it changes the point of lock but not the bias before lock.
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to sit on your arse with a blank look on your face.

Click on my WWW link for information on chips and ElanScan.
User avatar
ESM
God
 
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 10:08

Postby F1 LOTUS » Thu 06.07.2006, 21:37

Dave M wrote:
To help increase the ultimate work the rears are able to do relative to the fronts, I can:

1) increase the line pressure to the rear calipers
2) install a grippier rear pad
3) increase the size of the rear rotor
4) install stiffer springs in front to prevent dive and weight transfer
5) lighten the front of the car

Sound right?


6) Lower car / C of G :D
User avatar
F1 LOTUS
God
 
Posts: 2199
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 18:17
Location: SoCal, USA

Postby Candles » Fri 07.07.2006, 15:07

7) Strengthen the rear wishbone arrangement to cope with the extra torque.

Just a thought......
User avatar
Candles
God
 
Posts: 1496
Joined: Tue 22.04.2003, 09:58
Location: Bristol, UK

Postby ESM » Fri 07.07.2006, 19:35

I reckon increasing rear braking won't cause a stress problem to the rear wihsbones, because

1) in spite of the fact the brake force reacts through the rear suspension arms the ultimate torque is effectively limited by the tyre adhesion and so the design will have been developed with an appropriate maximum torque capacity - increasing brake performance can never exceed tyre performance.

and

2) We are talking only about returning to a level comparable to stock performance anyway.
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to sit on your arse with a blank look on your face.

Click on my WWW link for information on chips and ElanScan.
User avatar
ESM
God
 
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 10:08

Electronic Brake Force Distribution

Postby johnbenk » Sat 08.07.2006, 05:29

With all the technical information regarding brakes. Can some one explain WHY the car my belonging to my wife which is a 1,1
Hyundai Getz and has Dual Diagonal servo assisted brakes 10inch DISCS at the front and 8 inch DRUM BRAKES AT the REAR and is fiited with EBD can STOP far better than my Elan.

With only using the Elan for Car shows,High days and Holidays, after driving the Hyundia and then using the Elan for driving I find that using the
Brakes of the Hyundia again after getting use to the Elan Brakes after driving I nearly go through the windscreen when applying the Brakes on the Hyundia.

Is it the "EBD" that is making the braking THIS GOOD. :!: :!: :!: CAN THIS BE RIGHT?????

Could a system using EBD be modified to fit a Lotus Elan .
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
johnbenk
The only Gay in the Village
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Wed 21.09.2005, 20:46

Postby ESM » Sat 08.07.2006, 16:47

It would be great to have such a system but its a bit complex for an enthusiast to develop.

The main thing that makes the Elan's brakes feel bad relative to current cars is the lack of pedal sensitivity bcause the servo assistance is relatively small (this is why the same pedal pressure throws you forward in one car but is relatively light braking in the other). The ultimate braking performance IS probably better in the Elan because the tyre performance will be better than most cars. The other issue, for me anyway, is that the stock system pedal had what I can only describe as 'numb' feel - there seems to a curious lack of feedback that I can't really explain.
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to sit on your arse with a blank look on your face.

Click on my WWW link for information on chips and ElanScan.
User avatar
ESM
God
 
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 10:08

Thanks for reply

Postby johnbenk » Sat 08.07.2006, 16:55

Hi

Thanks ESM . I gather from this any ideas of using a "Chip" to control the Brake Proportional Valve pressure is out of the question????
User avatar
johnbenk
The only Gay in the Village
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Wed 21.09.2005, 20:46

Postby ESM » Sat 08.07.2006, 17:49

Yes - the system present on other cars is there because they have ABS and already have a computer effectively in charge of braking so its easy to add bias control to the system. The Elan has no ABS and developing such a system and requires professionals with resources and a lot of testing (off the public roads). I'll stick to the simple system.
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to sit on your arse with a blank look on your face.

Click on my WWW link for information on chips and ElanScan.
User avatar
ESM
God
 
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 10:08

Postby stevo » Mon 10.07.2006, 18:13

i already have hispec 4 pots on 285mm discs but im about to upgrade to 325mm rotors on bells. :-D bigger=cooler=longer=better :-D
arancio baby! thats italian for orange! i think?
User avatar
stevo
God
 
Posts: 1897
Joined: Mon 21.04.2003, 17:16
Location: Aboyne, royal deeside, scotland

Postby F1 LOTUS » Mon 10.07.2006, 20:33

Stoppies :lol: :lol: :lol:

Post some pic's :D
User avatar
F1 LOTUS
God
 
Posts: 2199
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 18:17
Location: SoCal, USA

Postby L.G. » Tue 06.03.2007, 02:05

Hi,

Got a question, especially to ESM
I read stuff in your links, stoptech. You know they do a braking test with a nissan 350z and the best thing to do turns out to be an upgrade on all four brakes rear and front.
www.zeckhausen.com/Testing_Brakes.htm
Now the first question, is elan front biased (stock brakes)? And second question, if you change the rear disks relative to the fronts (I try to mean, by keeping the 258(front)/230(rear) proportion and making it for ex. 300/267) would that make the car stop better?
'95 S2 driver #286
User avatar
L.G.
Fanatic
 
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed 07.09.2005, 22:34
Location: Istanbul/Turkey

Postby ESM » Tue 13.03.2007, 19:01

ESM wrote:...

Redressing the frontward proportioning changes caused by front disc size and pot area increases is tricky. You want essentially the same front brake torque vs rear brake torque the Lotus set up (because they CAN set up a car to handle well). The problem is that the transition in the slope of the brake bias graph occurs at a certain brake line pressure not a braking torque - the braking torque of the transition is determined by the size of calipers & discs and you've been and gone and changed them. So if you up the rear efficiency in proprtion to the front you delay the transition - relative to stock - and move the bias much further to the rear than standard after the initial proportional slope. I've stuck a graph on that shows a stock setup, a Hi-Spec setup and a couple of hypothetical front & rear upgrades to show what can happen to the brake balance if you're not careful.



The graph's on page 2 of this thread, 2nd last post
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to sit on your arse with a blank look on your face.

Click on my WWW link for information on chips and ElanScan.
User avatar
ESM
God
 
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 10:08

Postby L.G. » Thu 15.03.2007, 00:08

Sorry I've missed that bit of your write-up... :oops:
Thanks for answering
'95 S2 driver #286
User avatar
L.G.
Fanatic
 
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed 07.09.2005, 22:34
Location: Istanbul/Turkey

Previous

Return to Suspension and Brakes

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests