Pinky II

Moderators: theelanman, dapinky, Specky, clemo, Nige, Sy V, Dave Eds, DaveT, Elanlover, muley, Enright, algirdas, nitroman, GeoffSmith

Postby Monty » Fri 12.08.2005, 15:10

Since Pinky II is going on the NORLOG stand at the Wyreside Hall event, thought i`d do a little bit on the engine bay cause the heat shields went dull and the rust was coming through so i just clean them and used hi temp Aluminium colour spray. Thanks to Darren i`ve also installed the silcone hoses now the engine bay is looking sweet :D

ps i`ve installed my dump valve and now the fluttering has gone from the turbo :) cause that was doing my head in. I`ve also installed the silencer so i don`t get the woshhhhh noise from the dump but it`s done feck all :roll:
Attachments
New hoses 2.jpg
New hoses 2.jpg (59.19 KiB) Viewed 7841 times
User avatar
Monty
Chunder King!
 
Posts: 7977
Joined: Sun 11.01.2004, 22:32
Location: Leeds

Postby Doug » Fri 12.08.2005, 16:55

N-I-C-E , Monty !! :clap:
Image
User avatar
Doug
LEC Founder
 
Posts: 7468
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 06:43
Location: Oregon Coast, USA

Postby Dico » Fri 12.08.2005, 17:29

Does'nt the stock Elan expansion tank let it down somewhat?

anyone up for a project :wink:
User avatar
Dico
Fool Boy Four - Founder
 
Posts: 3569
Joined: Mon 01.12.2003, 09:45
Location: Moderator Manchester

Postby John_W » Fri 12.08.2005, 23:14

Dico wrote:Does'nt the stock Elan expansion tank let it down somewhat?
anyone up for a project :wink:

Hmmm...
I know just what you mean Dico, so I had a bit of a surf of the designer sites on the web and came up with the cheeky little number at the bottom which I think would work really really well on Pinky.

I think if he coated Pinky's header tank in sticky-back plastic Monty could be onto a winner for sure. I think this faux-stained-glass example could give him that whole new look he's been searching for.

If you don't fancy stained glass, fear not! There are many different exciting patterns to choose from here.

We could be onto something really different here. Why put boring clear plastic film on your car to protect it from stone chips when you could have some of these?

John 8)
Attachments
fablon.jpg
fabby fablon
fablon.jpg (3.93 KiB) Viewed 7821 times
User avatar
John_W
Heid-bummer
 
Posts: 3780
Joined: Mon 21.04.2003, 12:31
Location: Aberdeen

Postby Doug » Sat 13.08.2005, 06:34

me thinks John's had a wee bit too much to drink tonite :drunk:
Image
User avatar
Doug
LEC Founder
 
Posts: 7468
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 06:43
Location: Oregon Coast, USA

Postby John_W » Sat 13.08.2005, 08:26

Doug wrote:me thinks John's had a wee bit too much to drink tonite :drunk:

OK Doug it's a fair cop. Wife and kids away and me forced to stay in with only the dog, TV computer and booze cabinet for company.

I was feeling frivolous.

Mea culpa. Please dock me one meaningless post... oh OK two then.
John :(
User avatar
John_W
Heid-bummer
 
Posts: 3780
Joined: Mon 21.04.2003, 12:31
Location: Aberdeen

Postby Monty » Sat 13.08.2005, 18:34

John_W wrote:
Doug wrote:me thinks John's had a wee bit too much to drink tonite :drunk:

OK Doug it's a fair cop. Wife and kids away and me forced to stay in with only the dog, TV computer and booze cabinet for company.

I was feeling frivolous.

Mea culpa. Please dock me one meaningless post... oh OK two then.
John :(


LMAO :lol: just glad u don`t induldge in mushrooms :roll:
User avatar
Monty
Chunder King!
 
Posts: 7977
Joined: Sun 11.01.2004, 22:32
Location: Leeds

Postby ESM » Wed 17.08.2005, 10:19

It looks very nice Monty but I'm not sure about the air filter.

1) It gets hot air - bad for power
2) It might give less flow resistance but do you really think you see boost sooner as a result (see point 1)?
3) Less flow resistance generally comes at the price of letting in more wear inducing particles

I know the stock box isn't pretty but I prefer it as an induction route over open filters.
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to sit on your arse with a blank look on your face.

Click on my WWW link for information on chips and ElanScan.
User avatar
ESM
God
 
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 10:08

Postby Monty » Wed 17.08.2005, 11:25

ESM wrote:It looks very nice Monty but I'm not sure about the air filter.

1) It gets hot air - bad for power
2) It might give less flow resistance but do you really think you see boost sooner as a result (see point 1)?
3) Less flow resistance generally comes at the price of letting in more wear inducing particles

I know the stock box isn't pretty but I prefer it as an induction route over open filters.


To me the whole point to the open filter is for the looks.

1) The air feed underneath the filter is still there, but i do need to reposition the air feed from underneath the wheel arch in to a direct flow of air from the front grill (some how)
2) i`ve noticed no differance in boost with the airbox on or with the open filter.
3)there`s no chance of any particles getting through the filter
User avatar
Monty
Chunder King!
 
Posts: 7977
Joined: Sun 11.01.2004, 22:32
Location: Leeds

Postby ESM » Wed 17.08.2005, 12:45

Ok the pipe to the wheel arch is still there but the filter draws in air from all round its circumference so the air will still be warmer than it would otherwise.

You say no particles get through with a lot of conviction, is that based on information suppplied by the manufacturer and is the filter described as a 'high flow' item? I made my initial remarks on the basis that all filters have a particle size threshold below which some particles will make it through the matrix, high flow filters generally having a higher size threshold.
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to sit on your arse with a blank look on your face.

Click on my WWW link for information on chips and ElanScan.
User avatar
ESM
God
 
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 10:08

Postby Monty » Wed 17.08.2005, 15:21

Yes i agree that there`s more warm air around the filter in the engine bay, but i`ve not felt any lost off power. There`s quite a few with open air filter ie. doug, costas. and i`ve not heard of them having any problems. Like i said i need to move the feed from under the wheel liner and maybe have to put a 2nd air feed like costas. I`m not the one to read to much in to things Alan, cause i`m not technically minded + my mind is on other things ie gearbox replacement :roll: I`ve only had a the car since march and she`s gone through a little work. But i wouldn`t mind a Custom chip to push Pinky over the 1 bar limit :wink:
User avatar
Monty
Chunder King!
 
Posts: 7977
Joined: Sun 11.01.2004, 22:32
Location: Leeds

Postby ESM » Wed 17.08.2005, 15:47

I like the way slipped that request in :roll: :wink:

I might have a slightly higher boost chip in the not too distant future but other developments (remapping the fueling and spark advance under power enrichment) need to be sorted first. Having said that I think 0.9bar is probably ringing that wee turbo's neck enough. If you really want more you might want to mess around with the wheels in the turbo. I'm going to do a custom chip for just such a setup soon.
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to sit on your arse with a blank look on your face.

Click on my WWW link for information on chips and ElanScan.
User avatar
ESM
God
 
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 10:08

Postby Paul.P » Wed 17.08.2005, 16:12

Alan, will you tell us where to get the turbo altered, & what to ask for as well ?. Am i guessing this is a development of what Mr Vickers has done ?
JPS M100 was built from bare chassis up to create one off M100 in the mould of JPS Team Lotus
Paul.P
God
 
Posts: 4970
Joined: Sun 14.12.2003, 18:18
Location: Oakham, Rutland

Postby ESM » Wed 17.08.2005, 16:45

I'd refer you to Mr Vickers and I'm pretty sure he'd refer you to Turbo Dynamics
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to sit on your arse with a blank look on your face.

Click on my WWW link for information on chips and ElanScan.
User avatar
ESM
God
 
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 10:08

Postby Monty » Wed 17.08.2005, 19:16

ESM wrote:I like the way slipped that request in :roll: :wink:

I might have a slightly higher boost chip in the not too distant future but other developments (remapping the fueling and spark advance under power enrichment) need to be sorted first. Having said that I think 0.9bar is probably ringing that wee turbo's neck enough. If you really want more you might want to mess around with the wheels in the turbo. I'm going to do a custom chip for just such a setup soon.


Sounds kool, keep us up to date. Dico`s has the BBR and his boost needle goes right over the 1 bar and seem`s to be able to hold the boost with no probs :roll:
User avatar
Monty
Chunder King!
 
Posts: 7977
Joined: Sun 11.01.2004, 22:32
Location: Leeds

Postby ESM » Wed 17.08.2005, 21:51

The boost gauge in my red car goes over 1bar too - the boost doesn't though, the gauge is just a bit of an exhibitionist.

The fact is that the extra boost the BBR delivers puts more air into the engine but since the FCD clips the MAP reading you don't get any more fuel after 0.8bar so all that's happening after that point is the mixture gets steadily leaner as the boost rises. The stock fueling map is certainly too rich at around 10.4 a/f ratio. If the BBR hits 1.1bar (that'll be a peak at around 4500RPM it won't hold it up to redline) then a back of envelope calculation reveals the a/f ratio will be 12. Great you might say that's around the optimum value under boost - fair enough but the spark advance is set up for 10.4 so some knock is inevitable. The knock control of the ECU is then activated except because you've disabled the boost control it doesn't work - oops. If you think BBR gave any attention to the ability of the turbo to run 1.1bar you've more faith in human nature than I do.

As piece of design/engineering the BBR kit is at best a bodge - it sucks (or, more accurately, it blows :wink: ). Once I map the timing & spark advance you'll get more power with 0.9bar than the BBR produces with 1.1.
It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but it doesn't take any to sit on your arse with a blank look on your face.

Click on my WWW link for information on chips and ElanScan.
User avatar
ESM
God
 
Posts: 2441
Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 10:08

Postby Nige » Thu 18.08.2005, 08:58

Once I map the timing & spark advance you'll get more power with 0.9bar than the BBR produces with 1.1.


Alan, I like where you're coming from :D . Optimising the current set up does it for me as I don't want to go down the route of modifying the internals of the Turbo (yet). As ever, if you need a guinea pig..................
User avatar
Nige
LEC Administrator
 
Posts: 3030
Joined: Thu 10.07.2003, 19:04
Location: Dorset and Surrey

Postby Monty » Thu 18.08.2005, 11:29

Alan,

Wish i was technical as u, but do understand that the BBR kit is a botch job (ie same as FCD and bleed valve) and prefer u`r chip for saftey reasons and able to control the fuel mixture. Dico would like to go the chip way but at the mo there`s a huge difference in performance and he`s reluctant to remove it. I`ve drove a few M100 and none go as quick as Pauls on the standard turbo.

Look forward to the new chip, i`m with Nige if u need a test subject let me know.

This forum is very lucky to have u Alan (creep creep LMAO) :D
User avatar
Monty
Chunder King!
 
Posts: 7977
Joined: Sun 11.01.2004, 22:32
Location: Leeds

Postby John_W » Thu 18.08.2005, 13:11

Aha,
an interesting discussion.

Monty, if you want evidence of the standard turbo running out of puff, look at how the boost declines on the right hand side of this graph for all of the curves (standard chip, Everest V3 & V4). I interpret this graph to mean that the standard turbo cannot sustain boost over 0.8 bar for very long (say ten seconds). Now that's usually quite long enough I agree, but it does point to the limitations of the turbo.

http://www.asnu59.dsl.pipex.com/elan/graphs/dyno_9mar.jpg

I've talked to others who've tried both an say that the bleed valve/mechanical solution does give better response and more kick than the chip; I just don't have any dyno data yet to demonstrate this.


Alan,
Any thoughts on modifying the boost look-up rate to update each cycle instead of every second cycle as you mentioned earlier this year? Surely that will improve response (or maybe make it more flaky, hmmm).

The map of ignition and fuel should certainly get better power and torque delivery; personally I'm more interested in the shape of the curve than the ultimate power. I'll be glad to help by getting another dyno run for comparison.

As I've just changed my insurance to a company who will insure modifications for a reasonable price, I'll be running the Everest in my car from Sunday instead of the standard chip I've had in all the time except for dyno runs (honest). 8)

John
User avatar
John_W
Heid-bummer
 
Posts: 3780
Joined: Mon 21.04.2003, 12:31
Location: Aberdeen

Postby Monty » Thu 18.08.2005, 14:31

Think i need to get myself a laptop and do some ES runs in Dico`s and Pinky II :roll:

Dico`s Boost kicks in very quick and jumps of the bloody gauge, could do with installing a better boost gauge.
User avatar
Monty
Chunder King!
 
Posts: 7977
Joined: Sun 11.01.2004, 22:32
Location: Leeds

PreviousNext

Return to Projects - Car (Major)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests