Probably more info than you were expecting, but everything I do ends up with a story:
I have not seen Toby's 3D version in real life but when I did MY 3D project a few years ago, Shapeways said they couldn't reproduce the texture since the only material to use for outdoor life was their STRONG, Nylon.
JC-Corner.jpg
Toby mentions that his are also "grainy" but a lot better than no corners at all. I considered that logic but also considered doing them in ABS and vapor smoothing them but I was always worried the ABS wouldn't survive for long.
For my pattern, I used an original replacement corner that came with my M100 as the basis and had a professional drafting company do the drawings (it wasn't cheap). The originals (and mine) have a much "deeper" side than Toby's (looking at his pictures and subsequently his .STL. I still have a few sets of my Shapeways version but the outer finish was unacceptable for me so I stopped working on them.
A few US owners ordered pairs and since they were warned about the matte finish, never complained. To keep them in place, Lotus punched a hole in one of the sides so the urethane had a good bite on the not-so-easy-to glue material during installation and it would prevent them from "swimming" up and out of the urethane on a hot day.. Toby's have much less side length and there was no mention of adding the hole for retention. Toby's also don't have the lip on the included corner which helps "finish" the appearance.
Toby-Corner.jpg
The Lotus Vacuum Formed versions also have some texture but nowhere as much as the 3D versions and ironically they are coated with something to make then "semi gloss". I have included my comparison of the original, my version and the Lotus Block.
Comparison of 3.jpg
I am NOT kicking Toby's version, just pointing out why I stopped working on making replacements.
A friend was going to help me make a proper vacuum form mold from my original, but the amount of re-work required after making a "sheet" of corners discouraged me and getting the molding company to cut them up added a huge increase in price.
I still feel the 3D version is not acceptable due to the texture. I also feel it should be made as the original one was made, longer sides and the holes to keep it seated.
I now own my own 3D printer and have yet to find a solution for the outer texture of the corners, although I plan to print a few in ABS, smooth them in acetone and leave them out in the sun for an extended period to see how they fare after a month or two in the North Carolina climate.
Meanwhile, I have been looking for more of the Lotus ORIGINAL replacements and was told by the dealer the ones he was offering were the correct, original corners. I wasn't very pleased to finally receive the Lotus Bodge, but rather than worry about it, I decided to put them up here since they were sold via a group buy many years ago and buyers were happy. I would have been more pleased if I had gotten 8 of the pieces as quoted instead of 4. There IS a difference in the part numbers between the two versions.
These DID NOT come from Dave Bean. He sold his last batch to LEC a long time ago.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.