by M100TURBOFR » Thu 02.05.2019, 15:04
Hello All
As promised I'm reverting back with my final proposal. The parts in question (rear light protective covers) can indeed be manufactured. In the event of a firm order - minimum 15 pairs - we benefit from a preferential price (compared to normal selling price) and this for all subsequent orders. A priori we have 21 interested parties (perhaps 23 with Wayne and Justnogood). I'll leave it up to you to decide whether you wish to go ahead. Note that packaging and postage will of course be in addition as will be the transportation cost of the parts to me here in France (to be confirmed at a later date).
A downpayment of 25% - purchaser commitment - is requested by the supplier in order to launch the production. The balance will be due on completion of production and prior to dispatch to me.
This venture was solely intended to find a source for these obsolete parts and I consider I have succeeded. I will not make any profit at all but I naturally do not wish to find myself in debt due to any defaulting. By confirming your order you commit yourself. Furthermore, as proof of my integrity and honesty, I'd appreciate it if some members - BCN (John), Geoff (my CO pot), Trevor, Dave (Clemo) whom I have met personally, and perhaps Matt Schulde could vouch for me. Thank you.
Production process
Anti-UV treated polyurethane-based resin providing superior resistance to external exposure (ultraviolet, moisture, temperature) compared to metallic mould injected polycarbonates. The latter manufacturing process (metallic mould) is extremely expensive and amortization is impossible on small/medium quantity series. A vacuum casting method, more suited for the small quantities envisaged, has therefore been adopted.
Markings: SE11 RE11 FE11 E11 etc, etc… Although mandatory – here in France in any case (and doubtless in the UK) – this aspect is never controlled/inspected during the MOT. Reference is made to it on the control sheets but it does not fall under any of the stipulated controls.
Nevertheless, the proposed parts will naturally bear all of the mandatory markings except that of the initial manufacturer (compliance with legislation, copyright or other).
Cost: Despite all my efforts/arguments, no additional discount is possible. However, the preferential tariff offered to us represents a saving of 50€ /50 GBP compared to the normal selling price (530€ per pair/275€ per unit). Reasons evoked for being unable to grant a further discount:
• Fairly high risk of erroneous/faulty parts due to the part’s size/shape and low thickness. Moulds only provide a limited number of parts (20 or so), therefore any failure/foul up results in material loss, time loss and drop in mould potential.
• Labour intensive process, set-up and machine times (casting, heat treatment).
• Raw material costs.
Bear in mind that this part is no longer available (apart from a breakers yard) and of course new.
I have however his guarantee that we will benefit – for all orders – from the initially proposed preferential price of 480 € (Euros) per pair and 250€ (Euros) per unit (irrespective of side). Prices are inclusive of VAT. This applies to a “Group purchase” of a minimum of 15 pairs.
Any “outsider” (individual purchase) will have to pay 530€ per pair and 275€ per unit for the same articles.
The “Group purchase” – if it goes ahead – would be subject to a downpayment (advance) of 35% (although he’d accept 25%) representing a purchase commitment on the part of the buyers. This sum would naturally be deducted from the final sum. The outstanding balance would be payable just prior to dispatch from his premises.
Therefore, subject to the chosen percentage (35% or 25%) each buyer would have to make a downpayment of 168€ (35%) or 120€ (25%) in order to secure the order. If the supplier is willing to accept 25%, then I suggest that we go for this.
Delivery time: As previously mentioned, this would be roughly 2 months after receipt of order (excluding national holidays and the usual 2 to 4 weeks holiday period – July, August or September).
Dispatch : To avoid all hassle/complication for the supplier, he would prefer to dispatch to a single location (centralisation) which would be easier for him (especially with “Brexit” coming up OR NOT!! as regards the UK).
I’d be willing to act as a receiving and dispatch point.
Transportation & packaging costs to me would naturally be in addition as would be the Postage & packaging costs for sending out to each person. These costs would have to be worked out and agreed upon.
M100TurboFR / David
Where there's a will, there's a way.