Timing belt

Moderators: theelanman, dapinky, Specky, clemo, Nige, Sy V, Dave Eds, DaveT, Elanlover, muley, Enright, algirdas, nitroman, GeoffSmith

Timing belt

Postby LittleRob » Wed 31.07.2013, 12:14

Back in the forum for the first time in a while. My car has been off the road for a couple of years and is currently in for a service/MOT. They have suggested changing the timing belt as it should be done at 60,000 miles/6 years. The current belt has done 9,000 miles in 9 years.

However, I want to use the car on Saturday for a long-ish drive, and they are not sure they can get the job done before then. Given how long its been off the road I'm tempted to get the car back so that I can drive it for a couple of days to check that everything else is OK. What do you guys think?

LR
LittleRob
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu 23.09.2004, 08:18
Location: Essex

Re: Timing belt

Postby rip » Wed 31.07.2013, 12:29

9 years...
I would be tempted to chance it but in the back of my mind I would be wondering how big the bill would be if the belt snapped.

The sensible option would be to use the other car at the weekend & book yur Elan in for a new belt.
1990 SE
User avatar
rip
God
 
Posts: 5904
Joined: Sun 08.04.2007, 07:48
Location: Milton Keynes, UK

Re: Timing belt

Postby LittleRob » Wed 31.07.2013, 13:04

Thanks for the speedy reply.

I have 2 competing fears:

1. I *do* change the timing belt, but something else goes wrong with the car which we failed to see coming because we haven't driven it much more than a mile to the garage and back. Though that's not to say that we'd spot anything wrong in the 100 or so miles that I might fit in between now and Saturday.

2. I *don't* change the belt and it goes wrong.

In any case it possible that the garage might keep the car for the next 2 days and not manage to find the time to change it, in which case I'm in the worst of both worlds.

LR
LittleRob
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu 23.09.2004, 08:18
Location: Essex

Re: Timing belt

Postby epipete » Wed 31.07.2013, 14:14

I think, if you use your head rather than your heart, you have answered your own question!

Risk of belt failure - possible
Risk of unspecified underuse failure - possible
Lack of time to gain confidence - high

Put it into the garage have them change the belt and do a service, if you get it back in time then that is when you can make a decision and if not back then it is out of your hands but when it is returned you can then gain the confidence needed prior to a long journey :burnout:
You know more than you think you know, just as you know less than you want to know. ... Oscar Wilde
User avatar
epipete
God
 
Posts: 2415
Joined: Wed 17.08.2011, 11:03
Location: Chippenham

Re: Timing belt

Postby daveiow » Wed 31.07.2013, 16:40

Hi LR
It seems to me you are almost in the position of a "new" owner 8)
When I took over my car two years ago the belt had been changed but it had done so few miles over the previous eight years (and having studied this wonderful site) I had reservations on undertaking longish trips for fear of breakdowns.
Now having two Ypres trips, Donington and Brands Hatch under my belt not to mention two MOTs and a service at Sportomotive at Salisbury i feel I "know" her much better :D
Having said that a set of silicone hoses to go on in the spring , a good look at the oil cooler pipes and new gear change cables will be needed before I am happy I have done all I reasonably can :D

But then this is all part of the fun!

daveiow :m100:
"live long and prosper"
Calypso Red 91se. Hispecs,PNM rear calipers,Samco's & BCN cables & SSK so far!(oh and a new hood and paint) sold
Evora n/a
Alfa Sud 1.5ti long gone!
User avatar
daveiow
Fanatic
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Wed 08.06.2011, 05:25
Location: Isle of Wight.UK

Re: Timing belt

Postby DeanG » Sun 11.08.2013, 16:56

Use the 10% rule. If it runs OK for a mile try a 10 mile loop after a full cool down try a 100 mile loop. If that is OK you are probably ready to tackle a continent.
User avatar
DeanG
God
 
Posts: 957
Joined: Fri 19.12.2003, 22:12
Location: Virginia USA

Re: Timing belt

Postby LittleRob » Mon 12.08.2013, 10:17

In the end we didn't get the belt done in time, so went to the lakes in the big car (An XC-90). It was probably the smart move in any case because:

a) We took bikes (since we could).
b) For one of the days it rained incessantly.
c) The back road into Little Langdale is not really Elan territory IYKWIM !

Car is done now, and we did 100 miles top down to Richmond and back yesterday in the sun ;-)

LR
LittleRob
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu 23.09.2004, 08:18
Location: Essex

Re: Timing belt

Postby DeanG » Tue 13.08.2013, 00:21

LittleRob wrote:Car is done now, and we did 100 miles top down to Richmond and back yesterday in the sun ;-)


Funny how it works out, here in Virginia Isle of Wight is about 100 from Richmond.
User avatar
DeanG
God
 
Posts: 957
Joined: Fri 19.12.2003, 22:12
Location: Virginia USA

Re: Timing belt

Postby Oliver » Fri 10.01.2014, 01:04

Right. I'm a little confused. In 12 years of N/A ownership I have replaced my timing belt 3 times. I have just read a 4XE1 t/belt change guide linked from WikiLec, the author of which states that the engine is non interference. His belt had shredded following water pump failure, presumably stopping the cams dead with the crank rotating. The engine was fine on fitting new belt / pump / tensioner / idler. Is our engine non interference? Does anyone know for sure?
M100 N/A - No PAS
RenautSport Megane 275 Cup
MGF
Benelli 2C
User avatar
Oliver
Fanatic
 
Posts: 414
Joined: Tue 15.03.2005, 21:49
Location: Maidstone, Kent

Re: Timing belt

Postby ccb056 » Sat 01.03.2014, 09:34

Oliver wrote:Right. I'm a little confused. In 12 years of N/A ownership I have replaced my timing belt 3 times. I have just read a 4XE1 t/belt change guide linked from WikiLec, the author of which states that the engine is non interference. His belt had shredded following water pump failure, presumably stopping the cams dead with the crank rotating. The engine was fine on fitting new belt / pump / tensioner / idler. Is our engine non interference? Does anyone know for sure?


http://youtu.be/_InB9F4Cwjo?t=34s
1991 Lotus Elan Fed, Monaco White
Mobil 1 5w50, PureONE PSL14459, Redline MT-90
Piper 2.5 Resonator PCE; 21mm wastegate; Everest
Quaife ATB LSD, BCN Cables and Short Shift, Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R
ccb056
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon 13.10.2003, 22:27
Location: Michigan, USA

Re: Timing belt

Postby nhaynes » Sat 15.03.2014, 10:34

The Lotus Elan M100 engine is interference or non free wheeling. This means if the timing belt fails, the pistons hit the valves and it starts getting very expensive!
Thanks,
Neil.
User avatar
nhaynes
Tinkerer
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue 11.01.2005, 23:19
Location: Essex

Re: Timing belt

Postby Brit-Car-Nut » Sat 15.03.2014, 14:44

Oliver wrote:Right. I'm a little confused. In 12 years of N/A ownership I have replaced my timing belt 3 times. I have just read a 4XE1 t/belt change guide linked from WikiLec, the author of which states that the engine is non interference. His belt had shredded following water pump failure, presumably stopping the cams dead with the crank rotating. The engine was fine on fitting new belt / pump / tensioner / idler. Is our engine non interference? Does anyone know for sure?

Without any doubt, the engine is an interference design and WILL bend valves and nick pistons if the belt breaks. Some people make up stories just to be contrary. You are smart to ask.
Please contact me via eMail, not by PM
Brit-Car-Nut
God
 
Posts: 4820
Joined: Tue 03.07.2007, 17:07
Location: Charlotte, NC USA

Re: Timing belt

Postby LO 2 US » Sun 15.06.2014, 19:16

If you are reading up on this Cam-belts thread strongly suggest that you also check "Water Pumps" discussions!! under "ancillaries" etc re some water pump drive teeth NOT matching the cambelts properly
LO 2 US
Newbie
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun 13.01.2013, 18:31
Location: West Sussex


Return to Engine

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests