Yep, agree with RonR - the O2 sensor plot gives relief.
I'd be suspicious of power data tho'. I don't know how EScan could measure it other than by a boost/%throttle comparison with an 'expected' max bhp? There is correlation there if you overlay data...
I hadn't been much interested in the past about bhp so I looked up my original 1499 conversion scan trip and got a similarly meaningless graph:-

RonR recently found discrepancy (with axes and a sensor voltage conversion factor, I think) in the original and I think you've probably found another. The axes seem meaningless - perhaps the shape is the only credible offering of bhp.
The cynic in me reckons it's a (say) '50% throttle of 160bhp = 80bhp'' or '0.3 out of 0.6 boost = 80bhp' kind of estimate without the sophistication of correct axes...no further accuracy than this...
It'd be interesting to see if anyone's made sense of it to date or given it any relevance?
ps using your axes theory, when you gave it 'beans' you'd have had ~200bhp...nah not partictularly impressed or convinced with this bit of the EScan software, I'm afraid...