GeoffSmith wrote:Engine speed comes from the rev counter signal. Road speed comes from the vehicle speed sensor (VSS). Selected gear is calculated, so it's probably not possible to differentiate between wheel slip and clutch slip.
If both signals are measured (not computed) and they are measured on opposite sides of the clutch (RPM at engine and speed at wheels), then I should be able to see what I'm looking for in the data depending on where the VSS actually sits. Plotting a scatterplot of speed vs RPM should result in the data falling along a couple straight lines whose slope corresponds to the gearing ratios (provided the RPM and speed are coupled due to the clutch not slipping).
For the VSS, I presume it is measured from the rotation of the front wheels (not the back)? Is it measured off one of the wheels (in which case depending on which wheel might break traction I might or might not see it) or is it measured before the differential?
In taking a closer look at the data I had another question about ElanScan behavior. In the posted ElanScan file, if you look at datapoints 105 to 107 this is clearly the shift from first to second (throttle is closed during the shift and the RPM's drop as I shift to the 2nd gear). However, the vehicle speed during this time is shown as increasing substantially. A little later I'm back on the throttle and the vehicle speed is shown as not increasing. The data looks like the vehicle speed measurements are delayed a bit relative to the other data measured. I can eyeball the delay and shift the data to adjust for it, but I thought I'd first ask whether there is indeed a known delay in the measured vehicle speed.
I took a quick look at an initial Excel scatterplot and I'll post a picture after I see if I can clean up the offset of the vehicle speed data (the graphing tool in ElanScan makes the X-Y scatterplot look strange, but in Excel it looks as expected but with the speed delay muddying the picture).
Knut