Boost and performance - gauge vs ElanScan

Post cries for help here if your topic fits no other thread in this category.

Moderators: theelanman, dapinky, Nige, Elanlover, Sy V, muley, Enright, algirdas, nitroman, GeoffSmith, clemo, Dave Eds, Specky, DaveT

Boost and performance - gauge vs ElanScan

Postby MikeBromwich » Sun 12.09.2021, 16:09


I've recently bought an S2 - having owned an SE about 20 years ago.

The boost gauge never shows over about 0.4, and the car doesn't seem to have the mid-range pull which I remember. I know that the S2 is down on power a little compared with the SE - and my memory is pretty vague!

I've made a couple of runs with ElanScan - and this seems to show the boost reaching about 0.6 and the wastegate solenoid working as expected. I've also tested the valve on the bench - and it seems fine. I therefore expect that the fault is with the boost gauge or transducer under reading (rather than the MAP sensor over reading - if that is possible?).

Could somebody who understands these things have a quick look at the attached ElanScan file - and let me know whether it looks OK? The car drives fine - so I'd just like to double-check that I'm not missing anything.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun 29.08.2021, 15:03

Re: Boost and performance - gauge vs ElanScan

Postby rip » Sun 19.09.2021, 22:11

The boost gauge is known to be inaccurate. It only gives a rough guide. The problem is often dirty contacts.
Elanscan is far more accurate. It logs data used by the car's ECU. The same is true for the temperature gauge. The gauge in the instrument panel runs from a different sensor so the car may believe the engine is cold when the gauge (& your own senses) tell you the engine is warm.
1990 SE
User avatar
Posts: 5867
Joined: Sun 08.04.2007, 07:48
Location: Milton Keynes, UK

Return to Miscellaneous Problems - Need Help!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest