Leads, coils, plugs, starters, starting probs etc.
Moderators: theelanman, dapinky, Specky, clemo, Nige, Sy V, Dave Eds, DaveT, Elanlover, muley, Enright, algirdas, nitroman, GeoffSmith
by Ashaman » Wed 06.06.2007, 22:30
I have pics of a couple timing tables:
Graph 1:
Graph 2:
So my questions are, all things being equal....
Which of the two should theoretically produce more power?
Which of the two should theoretically be more prone to detonation?
I have been playing with ECUs again, and working with the E6GM and E6GMX has made me rethink some things. #1 is (or darned close) stock map. #2 is the map I have been running for the last couple years. I was surprised to see this much difference between the two.
Anybody here really sharp on ignition tables?

-

Ashaman
- Fanatic
-
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Mon 21.04.2003, 20:22
- Location: Crown Point, IN
by Ashaman » Fri 15.06.2007, 20:05
Hmm... no input...
Well, apparently the answer (if there ever truly were a "all things being equal" scenario) would be graph 2.
It is interesting reading of timing tables; and even more interesting to me the variation that seems to exist; it really does seem to be a bit of a guessing game, even if you DO know what you are doing. Power could be more with less boost and more advance, or less advance and more boost, a lot of variables.
I did think this link was really interesting though -
www.streetrodstuff.com/Articles/Engine/Detonation/
It gives a lot of information as to the theory behind optimal ignitiong timing, etc. Some I knew already, but after reading through it I have a better understanding.
-

Ashaman
- Fanatic
-
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Mon 21.04.2003, 20:22
- Location: Crown Point, IN
Return to Ignition and fuelling
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests