The Brian MG-TC MGB-GT setup.lotos wrote:Matt - are you using the new Wilwood setup from Bob with the dust seals? Or the previous BrianMDB setup?

| Home | WikiLEC | Repairs | Upgrades | Gallery | Buy & Sell | Mountain Chips | Meets & Events | Contact |
|
Moderators: theelanman, dapinky, Specky, clemo, Nige, Sy V, Dave Eds, DaveT, Elanlover, muley, Enright, algirdas, nitroman, GeoffSmith
The Brian MG-TC MGB-GT setup.lotos wrote:Matt - are you using the new Wilwood setup from Bob with the dust seals? Or the previous BrianMDB setup?

nitroman wrote:Well fluck-a duck. My Giot's Brake Fluid Extractor stopped drawing a vacuum. The handle has to be forced to move up & down. You can do it but its against tremendous force. Has anyone with this (Doug, Ekapol, and ?) had theirs stop working? I had actually completed bleeding both calipers & was going to bleed each again as I always do with brakes, when it stopped "sucking".
The brake pedal is more firm & moves a far shorter distance than the white car (it should as the yellow car uses a caliper with smaller pistons), but not being able to bleed the calipers normally*, thoroughly really bothers me. Subject cross to this thread: viewtopic.php?f=64&t=9258&p=109472&hilit=Fluid+AND+Extractor#p109472
* = my usual way
lotos wrote:Wow - your setup really looks great. Better than new, that's for certain. Did you ever finish up the engine bay additions?

Doug wrote:Matt, you can't be hunched over in the engine bay for like--ever--after surgery . . .
nitroman wrote:So far, so good on my caliper protective coating! It's a nice smooth circle now.
I am now convinced that the decreased brake pedal movement is due to the caliper not requiring as much fluid to move the pistons. The pedal's movement is nearly nonexistant! The explanation has to lie in the fact that we are not dealing with the square of the piston(s) size, but the cube of them.
Going back to the chart on this post viewtopic.php?f=41&t=13306&p=174173&hilit=6811#p174173, reflects the piston-size squared.
I don't remember the piston sizes anymore, but take this as the example:
3" pistons x 2-piston calipers:
4 pistons total (four cylindrical columns of brake fluid)
3(cubed) = 27x4 = 108 cubic inches
VS
1.5" pistons x 4-piston calipers:
8 pistons total (eight cylindrical columns of brake fluid)
1.5(cubed) = 3.375x8 = only 27 cubic inches
Even doubling this to assume these pistons travel as far as the OE caliper pistons, you'd still only have 54 cubic inches, which is 50% the requirement of the original(s).
PS - Don't go hoffing at me about single-piston calipers. For these calculations a sliding caliper equals a 2-piston caliper as the single piston must travel twice as far.
bobbrown wrote:nitroman wrote:So far, so good on my caliper protective coating! It's a nice smooth circle now.
I am now convinced that the decreased brake pedal movement is due to the caliper not requiring as much fluid to move the pistons. The pedal's movement is nearly nonexistant! The explanation has to lie in the fact that we are not dealing with the square of the piston(s) size, but the cube of them.
Going back to the chart on this post viewtopic.php?f=41&t=13306&p=174173&hilit=6811#p174173, reflects the piston-size squared.
I don't remember the piston sizes anymore, but take this as the example:
3" pistons x 2-piston calipers:
4 pistons total (four cylindrical columns of brake fluid)
3(cubed) = 27x4 = 108 cubic inches
VS
1.5" pistons x 4-piston calipers:
8 pistons total (eight cylindrical columns of brake fluid)
1.5(cubed) = 3.375x8 = only 27 cubic inches
Even doubling this to assume these pistons travel as far as the OE caliper pistons, you'd still only have 54 cubic inches, which is 50% the requirement of the original(s).
PS - Don't go hoffing at me about single-piston calipers. For these calculations a sliding caliper equals a 2-piston caliper as the single piston must travel twice as far.
All looks very nice
One small point the bolts, caliper bracket to hub carrier are only 8.8 tensile and you have used what looks like button head on the hat to rotor fixings neither of which is as strong as the ones specified and I hope the latter are not stainless as they are usually less again unless you use A286 stainless steel.
There is no cubes involved in volume calculations it is
Bob
nitroman wrote:So far, so good on my disc/rotor protective coating! It's a nice smooth circle now.
max and andy wrote:Have you got a full photo of the engine bay it looks very clean. Max

Return to Projects - Other (Minor)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests