SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Moderators: theelanman, dapinky, Specky, clemo, Nige, Sy V, Dave Eds, DaveT, Elanlover, muley, Enright, algirdas, nitroman, GeoffSmith

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby BFG in the BRG » Sun 18.04.2010, 22:27

Well, bit of an update...on the fuel economy,
pre closed loop.....
constant 291 mile 70/80 mph run I got 36 mpg
251miles A/B roads with occasional hoon 27mpg



Having taken the BRG out of mothballs from the winter - I have finally got round to going for a spin

Bottom line is I now got 40mpg - this was based on a number of fairly long drives with the very occasional full throttle overtake manouver - but a good mix of Motorway, Dual Carriage way, A and B road - 375 miles.

So I would say it's possibly gone from around 30 ish mpg to 40mpg. :banana: and it's chipped.... - now all I need is for the exhaust to blow so I can get a Piper..... :-D
Alas soon to be Elan-less
I keep telling myself it is for the best
User avatar
BFG in the BRG
Fanatic
 
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue 13.05.2008, 14:13
Location: Eastbourne (God's Waiting Room)

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby DavidEJM » Sun 18.04.2010, 23:05

BFG in the BRG wrote: - now all I need is for the exhaust to blow so I can get a Piper..... :-D


Hole it with a screwdriver - accidentally of course! :roll: :roll:
Oooooh shiney!
User avatar
DavidEJM
Fanatic
 
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue 19.01.2010, 21:58
Location: Oxford

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby Bolsom » Thu 22.04.2010, 17:25

I reckon I'm getting about 38MPG with varied driving and today it sailed through the control technique (MOT). I justified the Everest for this
as it failed two years ago on emissions and cost a lot to get through eventually. The MOT lasts 2 years here.

Colin
Last edited by Bolsom on Fri 23.04.2010, 08:22, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Bolsom
Fanatic
 
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri 02.05.2003, 17:37
Location: Nr. Limoux, France

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby BFG in the BRG » Thu 22.04.2010, 21:59

Excellent news :beer:

I justified my Everest on fuel economy :-D

Faster acceleration and it pays for itself :banana:
Alas soon to be Elan-less
I keep telling myself it is for the best
User avatar
BFG in the BRG
Fanatic
 
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue 13.05.2008, 14:13
Location: Eastbourne (God's Waiting Room)

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby ashm » Mon 09.08.2010, 11:56

I've been trying to remove the manifold blanking plug on my new SE for some weeks... penetrating oil and heat didn't seem to be helping so yesterday I took the 2ft breaker bar to it, and:
IMAG0001 (Small).jpg

Hmm... what now? :shock:
Adam
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
ashm
God
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat 14.02.2009, 11:32
Location: South Wales

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby Jackonicko » Mon 09.08.2010, 12:24

Beer?
Jackonicko
 

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby Alan_C » Mon 09.08.2010, 14:19

Drill it out and re-tap? At least access should be easy. And the swarf will go down into the exhaust and shouldn't really harm anything? Though once tapped, you could tape a smaller hose to the vacuum cleaner that'll go into the lambda hole and suck any bits out?
User avatar
Alan_C
Fanatic
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu 20.08.2009, 09:40
Location: Hatfield, Hertfordshire UK

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby ashm » Mon 09.08.2010, 16:12

Alan_C wrote:Drill it out and re-tap?

That's what I'm thinking. Hey ho, will have to go get myself a suitable tap. I've got a nice set of cobalt drill bits that make short work of almost anything, but I suspect this job has more surprises for me yet.

Incidentally, this is a good example of a torsional failure of ductile material - the failure plane is perpendicular to the axis of the plug, indicating a shear limited scenario. A harder & more brittle material would likely have been tensile limited and fail along a helical surface at 45 degrees to this plane. The lack of beach marks and the smooth whirl shape across almost the whole plane indicate that crack propagation probably wasn't fatigue related; the torque required to unscrew the thread simply exceeded the torsional strength of the plug. Moral: anti-seize is a good idea.

Maybe the plug was quite ductile in the first place, or maybe two decades of temperature cycling (not to mention my extraction efforts!) have annealed it. At least it shouldn't be too tough to drill out.

On the other hand, anyone got a spare wastegate manifold? :roll:

Adam
User avatar
ashm
God
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat 14.02.2009, 11:32
Location: South Wales

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby tigerdog » Mon 09.08.2010, 18:35

I don't think there's another automotive site in the entire universe where one of the contributing members would post a picture like that then proceed to educate the rest of us on the difference between torsional and tensile fractures! God I love this place!!!! Thanks, Adam! :-D
"Refitting is the reverse sequence to removal, but you swear in different places."
User avatar
tigerdog
God
 
Posts: 2712
Joined: Tue 20.03.2007, 09:07
Location: San Diego, CA, USA

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby John_W » Mon 09.08.2010, 20:05

Doug,
I must respectfully submit that you missed the main point. :wink:

It's common in everyday life to hear people (newsreaders etc) confuse the terms stress and strain and use them almost synonymously. In this case torsion is the stress applied and brittle failure the strain suffered by the material. I think Adam was providing a useful illustration of the signatures which show the difference between ductile and brittle failure, with a handy comment on absence of fatigue cracks.

Or was the main point that he probably used too long a breaker bar? :mrgreen:

John :lol:

PS: my solution would be to stay open loop.
User avatar
John_W
Heid-bummer
 
Posts: 3780
Joined: Mon 21.04.2003, 12:31
Location: Aberdeen

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby GeoffSmith » Mon 09.08.2010, 20:11

ashm wrote:Hey ho, will have to go get myself a suitable tap.

If you're stuck, I know someone who borrowed a tap off a friend who then loaned it to me when I was changing my O2 sensor. Unfortunately, I sent it back to him but I could be seeing him in a couple of weeks...... :roll:
Calypso Red S2 #417

USB ElanScan interfaces - £60 incl. UK P&P & £65 incl. ROW P&P
User avatar
GeoffSmith
Kitty Fiddler
 
Posts: 15628
Joined: Fri 03.02.2006, 21:57
Location: S2#417 in Tytherington, Gloucestershire

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby ashm » Tue 10.08.2010, 00:10

GeoffSmith wrote:
ashm wrote:Hey ho, will have to go get myself a suitable tap.

If you're stuck, I know someone who borrowed a tap off a friend who then loaned it to me when I was changing my O2 sensor. Unfortunately, I sent it back to him but I could be seeing him in a couple of weeks...... :roll:


Hmm... I might chase you up on that, decent quality taps are pricey above about 12mm. Won't be for a while though, I'm off on a work trip for a while from Friday and in any case I'll probably declare this an "on the bench" job and try to sniff out another manifold to swap it with. I can even port the wastegate while I'm in there perhaps.

John_W wrote:PS: my solution would be to stay open loop.


Well, that would probably be the sensible option, it's true! ;-)

Adam
User avatar
ashm
God
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat 14.02.2009, 11:32
Location: South Wales

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby DeeAitch » Tue 10.08.2010, 20:33

GeoffSmith wrote:If you're stuck, I know someone who borrowed a tap off a friend who then loaned it to me when I was changing my O2 sensor. Unfortunately, I sent it back to him but I could be seeing him in a couple of weeks...... :roll:

I think I also know that man and see him everyday :P

If it was me I'd probably drill and tap the bung something like M8 or 10, insert a bolt - one that is not rock hard in case that also breaks :twisted: - and see if it would wind the bung into the manifold. These things sometimes have the last thread or 2 exposed to the exhaust gas so get well covered in crud. I was well surprised when mine came out in one piece.
Winding it in and then a bit of back and forth might loosen it up enough to come out without a fight.
User avatar
DeeAitch
God
 
Posts: 1773
Joined: Fri 09.05.2003, 22:11
Location: North East

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby Candles » Wed 11.08.2010, 20:10

If you are totally stuck I have 2 spare BCBs (big cast b4stards) which wouldn't take too long to swap in. You could borrow one, free the O2 sensor, fit it and send me back the other if you like. A bit heavy for the post so some sort of LEC courier would be in order. I'm near Grantham. Pm me if you want one.

Candles.
User avatar
Candles
God
 
Posts: 1496
Joined: Tue 22.04.2003, 09:58
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby niall » Wed 11.08.2010, 20:15

Adam,
Bad luck. I assume that as you mentioned only heat, you did not cool the plug with ice or dry ice!
I am planning to do this job some day and am interested to follow your progress.
I look forward to the next instalment. :D
User avatar
niall
Fanatic
 
Posts: 431
Joined: Tue 26.08.2003, 22:16
Location: Ardfern

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby Alan_C » Fri 13.08.2010, 17:23

I think luck has a big part to play with getting these bungs out. Mine was tight, really tight. My breaker bar is 4 feet long, and boy was I pulling at that! The bung finally started to shift and was very tight all the way out, but it didn't sheer. The threads in the manifold weren't too buggered once it was out and the lambda screwed in though a bit tight. I've now changed to a stiffy (to which I welded a lambda boss), so somewhere is the BCB, should be in my lockup.....somewhere.
User avatar
Alan_C
Fanatic
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu 20.08.2009, 09:40
Location: Hatfield, Hertfordshire UK

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby rip » Fri 13.08.2010, 20:16

I soaked mine with penetrating oil 3-4 times a week for a month before removing it.
It came out with no damage. Maybe I was lucky??
1990 SE
User avatar
rip
God
 
Posts: 5904
Joined: Sun 08.04.2007, 07:48
Location: Milton Keynes, UK

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby pjw12 » Tue 24.08.2010, 12:03

Im seriously considering doing this to the pealing pac blue, she rarely gets 250 out of a tank.
currently running an everest and peco and getting alot of 'rally car' burble and popping on over run, which when i was 18 would have been 'cool', but now im not so sure. Would going closed loop get rid of some of this?

Also is there any more power to be had with the closed loop system?
User avatar
pjw12
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon 26.04.2010, 10:56
Location: Woking

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby Enright » Tue 24.08.2010, 12:52

In theory, running the engine more efficiently SHOULD give more power and/or economy at the expense of pops & bangs of unburnt fuel, but in practise I'd say no - you won't notice any more power and pops & bangs will still happen. However your economy should dramatically improve. I believe that this is because the closed loop map is only operational under idling or normal driving conditions. When hammering it the O2 input is ignored, so you get maximum enrichment when you most need it. Then when you come off the throttle there can still be unburnt fuel which catches light in the exhaust.
Striking fear into the hearts of duplicate posts everywhere...! :P

BCingU,
Neil ;-)
User avatar
Enright
Modificator
 
Posts: 4860
Joined: Sun 19.12.2004, 19:21
Location: Arnold, Nottingham, England

Re: SE Closed loop conversion. Better Economy?

Postby pjw12 » Tue 24.08.2010, 13:02

That was my theory too, but thought in practice it might be different. Might have a nose underneath in a couple of weeks and check the system out for leaks. might think of adding a silencer in to quieten her down a bit and cut the 'pop's' down, she does sound a tad too sporty for even my liking if im honest!
User avatar
pjw12
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon 26.04.2010, 10:56
Location: Woking

PreviousNext

Return to Engine

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests