chassis — change of anti lift angle

[Giniw]

Hello,
What do you think about the change of the anti-lift angle Lotus made?
Is it really better? Is it *bad* to consider buying an early one?
Also, Lotus says that when changing an early chassis for a late one (only late available as spares), they provide(d) a conversion kit, which included two rear wishbones ... I suppose the galvanized later ones which were on the S2 are not compatible with the early chassis, aren't they? It could be a problem if they need to be replaced, isn't it?? (rust :/)
Thank you in advance!

PS: Generally speaking, is it a good idea to consider buying an early Elan? I heard about the tank problem, the chassis modification I am referring to, and I heard about the early front lights too... (Not sure of what the problem it was but I must say I liked their design. Too bad they had to change it!)

[DeanG]

There was a recall on the gas tank in the USA.

For the rear's it is probably not a big deal either way. I vaguely recall the change was introduced as part of the Federal development. There are rust problems with this part after 20 years so taking a good look and then making a decision to change them is more important.

I assume that you are in England. Make contact with some of the more enthusiastic owners, be patient, drive a few cars before buying, then buy and enjoy. Just remember that the M100 is a 20 year old hobby car.

[Giniw]

Thank you.

Yes I have read the Lotus service note about the recall on the gas tank. Is it simple to check if the tank has actually been serviced?

As for the rear's, what worries me the most is that I wonder whether the rear wishbones are any different on the early and the later chassis: if yes, are the first version wishbones still available as spare parts? Because even if they look OK when buying a car, they might need to be replaced one day ... :/

Well, no, in fact I'm French, there is not so much Élan here ... And I am planning to buy one to use it as a daily car ^^"

[Specky]

There's no notable difference on early wishbones, (excluding the galvanising) however there are different attaching components AKA the spacer.

There's a thread on here discussing the pros and cons of fitting the spacer on early cars.



TTFN

[Specky]

As to viewing a split filler neck on the tank it's easy if you have access to the correct tools, but a bugger if you don't.

The quick way to tell, brim the car with fuel, if the car absolutly stinks of fuel within the cabin especially after a couple of days, pound to a pinch of s**t the pipe is split.

The other way is to put a camera in the filler pipe and view the rear of the tank filler neck, for this you'll require a flameproof boroscope kit. I'm aware not many people have access to the a for mentioned kit hence giving the easier method first.

TTFN