Smaug is failing his California smog test due to high NOx emissions. Everything I've read indicates high NOx is produced at high combustion temperatures. EGR theoretically mitigates the issue by introducing a small amount of exhaust gas into the intake when NOx emissions might be high (i.e, part throttle, light load). Here's the rub: current test methodology requires measurements to be taken on a rolling road/dynomometer, in 2nd gear, at 15 and 25 MPH. In Smaug, 15 MPH is achieved at only 1625 RPM. I'm not sure there's enough vacuum to fully open the EGR valve. At low speed, it fails at 1135 PPM 835 max allowed; at higher RPM (2600) it passes at 709 PPM/ 779 max. Two years back, it barely squeaked by the same test 832/885. Looking back on previous tests, I see the 15mph test was run by some testers in 1st gear, which put RPMs up around 2600. This apparently now violates the testing standard.
I've read multiple, conflicting suggestions for reducing emissions on various forums. Here, where the community is both educated and thoughtful, I'd love to open a couple of topics:
- - Why is the EGR vacuum takeoff right at the throttle, while every other vacuum takeoff is at the back of the engine? Would moving it have the effect of increasing available vacuum to the EGR valve?
- Fuel octane rating on combustion temperature and NOx creation. Simply asked, is higher octane fuel beneficial or detrimental to NOx formation?
- Any other California owners, would you please post your most recent emissions scores? I'm trying to find out how much might be attributable to Smaug's, ahem, interesting hardware.



