Giniw wrote:Seriously now, are the judge really knowledgeable about the cars they are evaluating? (I never attended such an event, and find it hard to believe they know so well any random car)
I was once asked to be a judge at a National Triumph Show (probably some time around 1994 or 5), so I travelled half way across the country for a weekend. There were 3 judges, and we were all considered to be "fairly knowledgeable" about the cars we were to look at, and were given a score sheet for each of the 40 vehicles.
A quick walk-round individually meant that we each chose our own 'best 3' for the final - and there were no duplicates amongst our selections (if you think about it, we *should* all have picked the same 3 cars).
So we had to try to convince each other why "our" selection deserved to win.
3 classes, 3 winners, 3 runners-up, 3 highly-commended.......
It took over an hour! I was concerned with the mechanical presentation, one other judge was only interested in originality (even though one class was for 'modified' cars, one for 'original' and one for 'restored' ) and the last one wanted it to look perfect in the details..... even down to things like all slots in the screw-heads facing the same way.....
..... I'm glad my own car wasn't allowed to enter!
Since that day I have never entered a 'serious' car show, or judged one - and never will. Even at the 2019 Castle Combe "Elan 30 Anniversary" I refused to have anything to do with selecting my favourite car (as did Clemo), so we sent Mike and Barry off to pick their favourites, and no-one was ever going to get upset at that event if they didn't get a mention anyway - but some people take it all very seriously, and it is no longer for the entertainment of the audience, which I think is a bit of a shame.