by dapinky » Sun 29.09.2024, 10:09
I am one of those members here who are old enough to have cut our teeth on cars which had the simplest of control systems for the engines, and even something like the NA Elan would have seemed like black magic back in the 1970's - what with an ECU, Fuel Injection, and sensors all over the place - highly advanced stuff!
It is also stuff from an era which lasted only a comparatively short time (automotively speaking) and belonged to a small selection of cars (every manufacturer went their own way).
As such, I am somewhat in the dark as to the specifics of the system, and how the spark gets to the right place at the right time to meet the squashed petrol vapour in this particular car.
I would have a complete list of things to do/check/change on an older car (yes, I know, it's a very short list 'cos there was only points, plugs, condenser and rotor to look at until you got to advanced stuff like fuel pump, carb jets/floats and valve clearances.)....... but the theory *should* remain the same.
Most cars with a distributer were designed in such a way that the body of the dizzy would rotate through about 30degrees, whilst the shaft remained meshed to the camshaft (or other driveshaft) on a helical gear..... and if there was insufficient range to get the timing right, you simply lifted the dizzy out, rotated the shaft 1 tooth on the gear and dropped it back in - rinse and repeat.
The only thing that made anything more complex was when working on different engines, you needed to know what the firing order was, and which way the dizzy spins (yes, I've watched those masters of the universe who can fit all the leads on a V8 or V12 engine and get the HT leads right every time, whether it happens to be a Ford, Chevvy, Buick or Jaguar unit - as for me, I'd be into the Haynes Manual every time to find the right info).
The NA only fits in one location, so it *should* be straight into the right range of adjustment - and anything that stops this from being the case is relevant to this whole thread.
Now, whether it is a problem with the ECU (which basically adjusts the timing in the way an older system used balance weights and vacuum advance), or the rotor arm/cap I wouldn't like to guess - especially as I only really learned 'just enough' of these type of systems to get by, and on an individual basis.
Hence, my only suggestions have been to address the original question of checking the cambelt timing at the sprockets, and to see if the HT leads are int he wrong places...... anything to do with the spark timing (dynamically) is beyond my current knowledge.
So, with that in mind, I'll ask a question.......
....... with the timing light fitted to HT lead #1, and the engine off, can you find any position for the dizzy where the strobe activates? and if so, does it do so with movement of the dizzy, or only after the end point is reached and the engine is rotated further? (does that make sense???? it does to me, but I know what I'm trying to ask!).
Put it another way, with the dizzy advanced at full movement, how far out is the timing at the crankshaft markings - and is it the same with the engine running as it is with it static?
.... I ask to try to establish if it is a 'physical' limitation with a mechanical solution, or a 'timing' issue where it is part of the electronics.
Dave
Just the one now, but this one's mine! - and it will be finished eventually..... - but also temporary custodian of a project until it is finished enough for Angie to drive it
...oh, and a 2006 Freelander destined for the jungles of The Gambia - 4500 miles across roads, desert and tracks - what could possibly go wrong?