I don't use excel much at all so I don't know much about it but I unzipped your 2nd scan - the excel one - and pushed a graph-drawing button

.
I think it's drawn some sort of graph of everything but the axes and scales don't make a lot of sense, if any, and I couldn't see an obvious way of seperating the elements. I'd imagine there's a way of drawing graph lines seperately for chosen columns but I can't imagine excel to be as 'clevva' as EScan by sorting out axes and scales in order to make the data mean anything more sensible.
Just a couple of thoughts:-
1. Why not do a (say) 5min tickover EScan data grab that might outline anything basic before giving it beans to check bhp or boost etc. That way the 'horse' could be inspected for injury before it bolts out of the stable and gallops off down the road?
2. Your excel data shows you're on promid 1499, your air:fuel ratio is constantly spot-on at 14.7:1 your boost peaked at just about 0.6 at 86mph (line 2008) - so a standard ecu map? Horsepower readings made no sense on line 2008. I couldn't see an O2 sensor voltage, so I wonder if you're using Ron's excellent EScan_beta update and new protocol?
3. ps it looks like your highest revs were ~4200 at your highest speed...again line 2008 on the excel spreadsheet