I'm starting from a default position of "It's probably the CTS, because that sounds like CTS failure symptoms"...... and looking for evidence to support the theory (which may well be the wrong starting point).
Anyway, I see on the older (September) scan that the coolant temp got up to the point of the thermostat opening at 80C(ish) just under 10 minutes - but on the latest scan at 10 minutes (600 seconds) the temperature is 'only' reading IRO 60C and still climbing steadily.
Obviously, the ambient temperature in Sept was a tad warmer, but both scans seem to start from a couple of degrees difference, so that can be discounted a bit.
I have overlayed the 2 results and the blue trace is your September run, black is the October.
I have also added a couple of old results I have on the laptop...... the pink (low) line is from when I had a defective CTS earlier this year...... and the Green is from the first run after I replaced it.
The darker blue is from a different car, when I changed the coolant, pump, sensor and thermostat many years ago.
CTS comparison.jpg
I notice that your graphs both take significantly longer to get warm - and the graph 'shape' is different, rate of change is slowing on yours, but increasing on the 2 "good" ones...... clearly the duff CTS is a lot different, with absolutely nowt really happening!
Basically, I would expect your car to get hotter, quicker....... but either way, the scans don't show the thermostat opening now, when it just about did in September........
I have no idea what this information "proves", if anything, but it shows that your CTS is doing 'something' - even if not enough!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.