Post here if your topic fits no other thread in this category.
Moderators: theelanman, dapinky, Specky, clemo, Nige, Sy V, Dave Eds, DaveT, Elanlover, muley, Enright, algirdas, nitroman, GeoffSmith
by Kier » Fri 19.08.2005, 19:05
Seen a few times now people talking about Elan N/A's What does N/A mean?
For example at the bottom of clemos posts;
FROST SILVER N/A.
BRG N/A.
Cheers,
Kier.
-

Kier
- Fanatic
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Wed 13.07.2005, 20:48
- Location: Bournemouth
by John_W » Fri 19.08.2005, 19:25
Kier,
it stands for normally-aspirated ie no turbo. When the Elan was first launched there were two main options, the Elan or the Elan SE. The Elan SE was turbocharged, the Elan was not. It was not as simple as leaving the turbo off, however as a few bits were different (like no cam angle sensor on the non-turbo version) and the compression ratio on the n/a is higher.
Rumour has it that the n/a is actually faster initially until about 3000 revs when the turbo kicks in and the SE disappears into the distance.
In the event, Lotus sold very few of the non-turbocharged version because people wanted POWER. I believe most are 1990 or early '91. I'm not sure when the last non-turbocharged cars were made, but I'm sure somebody could help with that info.
The n/a is a rarer beast and probably cheaper to insure. It also has a certain following of dedicated sophisticated individuals looking for something different. But then one of them is Clemo so that spoils that theory.
John
-

John_W
- Heid-bummer
-
- Posts: 3780
- Joined: Mon 21.04.2003, 12:31
- Location: Aberdeen
-
by Doug » Fri 19.08.2005, 20:22
N/A is the code for the girlie version

-

Doug
- LEC Founder
-
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: Thu 17.04.2003, 06:43
- Location: Oregon Coast, USA
-
by Monty » Fri 19.08.2005, 21:10
N/A stands for Not Applicable

-

Monty
- Chunder King!
-
- Posts: 7977
- Joined: Sun 11.01.2004, 22:32
- Location: Leeds
by Kier » Fri 19.08.2005, 21:50
Monty wrote:N/A stands for Not Applicable

Boom Boom, I never saw that one coming!
Thanks John_W for your answer, that clears that up!
-

Kier
- Fanatic
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Wed 13.07.2005, 20:48
- Location: Bournemouth
by Nige » Fri 19.08.2005, 22:25
Also my initials so I just had to get one (as well

).
-

Nige
- LEC Administrator
-
- Posts: 3030
- Joined: Thu 10.07.2003, 19:04
- Location: Dorset and Surrey
by Rambo » Sat 20.08.2005, 08:00
Kier wrote:What does N/A mean?
I thought it meant Nae Acceleration ??
-

Rambo
- Don't push me
-
- Posts: 9144
- Joined: Wed 24.12.2003, 00:37
- Location: Both sides of the Tweed
by Michael » Sat 20.08.2005, 17:48
Never
Amusing,
maybe?

Former Elan owner
-

Michael
- God
-
- Posts: 903
- Joined: Sun 31.08.2003, 13:03
- Location: Delden in The Netherlands
by Nige » Sat 20.08.2005, 17:55
When I bought the BRG one from Clemo I promised to become a defender of the NAs, so I just have to respond (don't I)

.
All I'll say at this point is how many of you have driven one

-

Nige
- LEC Administrator
-
- Posts: 3030
- Joined: Thu 10.07.2003, 19:04
- Location: Dorset and Surrey
by Dico » Sat 20.08.2005, 20:56
Nige wrote:All I'll say at this point is how many of you have driven one

If i was ever to drive one i'm sure the initials would stand for.......
NEVER AGAIN!!!
-

Dico
- Fool Boy Four - Founder
-
- Posts: 3569
- Joined: Mon 01.12.2003, 09:45
- Location: Moderator Manchester
by Kier » Sun 21.08.2005, 21:06
Nige wrote:When I bought the BRG one from Clemo I promised to become a defender of the NAs, so I just have to respond (don't I)

.
All I'll say at this point is how many of you have driven one

Nige, will you be bringing the N/A to the southern meet in a couple of weeks? At least I won't have any probs keeping up with you this time if we drive up together

-

Kier
- Fanatic
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Wed 13.07.2005, 20:48
- Location: Bournemouth
by Nige » Mon 22.08.2005, 13:48
I might well do, if only to give Stevie the opportunity to take the p*ss (not that he needs a reason).
You surely can't be suggesting that your SE struggled to keep up with my (slow) S2 last time
(There are those round here who will tell you that S2's are slow, if so I guess I only buy slow Elans

)
-

Nige
- LEC Administrator
-
- Posts: 3030
- Joined: Thu 10.07.2003, 19:04
- Location: Dorset and Surrey
by John_W » Mon 22.08.2005, 19:25
Nige wrote:You surely can't be suggesting that your SE struggled to keep up with my (slow) S2 last time
Nige,
that's not by any chance the slow S2 with a big stainless exhaust which you use to test ElanScanMan's mountain chips is it?
John

-

John_W
- Heid-bummer
-
- Posts: 3780
- Joined: Mon 21.04.2003, 12:31
- Location: Aberdeen
-
by Nige » Mon 22.08.2005, 20:14
That'll be the one

-

Nige
- LEC Administrator
-
- Posts: 3030
- Joined: Thu 10.07.2003, 19:04
- Location: Dorset and Surrey
by Kier » Tue 23.08.2005, 13:20
John_W wrote:Nige wrote:You surely can't be suggesting that your SE struggled to keep up with my (slow) S2 last time
Nige,
that's not by any chance the slow S2 with a big stainless exhaust which you use to test ElanScanMan's mountain chips is it?
John

Well, I would never use the word struggled! I think it was more a case of me not wanting to push the SE, what with it being new to me and all that!
Although as John mentioned, I do think that little chip of yours may have had something to do with it!
-

Kier
- Fanatic
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Wed 13.07.2005, 20:48
- Location: Bournemouth
by KevH » Thu 25.08.2005, 12:30
You may have noticed that the 'N/A's R US' founder members have not responded (until now) on this post.
Its probably beacuse we did'nt want to attract any more abuse.....

Wot no Loti
-

KevH
- Fanatic
-
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sun 23.11.2003, 12:55
- Location: Doncaster
by Nige » Fri 26.08.2005, 17:56
I can't claim to be a founder member but I did promise!
-

Nige
- LEC Administrator
-
- Posts: 3030
- Joined: Thu 10.07.2003, 19:04
- Location: Dorset and Surrey
Return to General
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests